Implementation of the CLIL-Based 'One-Presenter Five-Interrogators' Technique to Improve the Oral Argumentation Skills of KPNK Cadets

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Meriah Kita Deliani

Abstract

The implementation of an Outcome-Based Education (OBE) curriculum in maritime vocational higher education requires a transformation of the learning process oriented towards competency outcomes. This study describes the implementation of the Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL)-based 'One-Presenter Five-Interrogators' technique in improving cadets' oral argumentation skills and critical reasoning. Using descriptive qualitative Classroom Action Research (CAR) conducted in two cycles, all 60 Semester 2 cadets of the KPNK Study Program at Politeknik Adiguna Maritim Indonesia Medan participated without a separate control group. Quantitative indicators showed improvements in: (a) cadets independently identifying field problems (10% to 72%); (b) analytical questions posed by interrogators (0% to 65%); and (c) presenter confidence ratings (mean 1.8 to 3.4 on a 4-point rubric). Data were collected through participatory observation, field notes, and problem draft documentation. Results indicate significant transformation in cadets' critical reasoning, from only 10% able to identify problems independently to being more analytical in mapping port operational phenomena. The 1:5 interaction technique created "professional pressure" triggering public speaking courage and sharper oral arguments. CLIL integration strengthened maritime literacy through accurate technical terminology use. The 'One-Presenter Five-Interrogators' technique proves effective in building argumentation and negotiation skills needed for industrial work practices and maritime marketing careers.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

References

  1. Belmawa, D. J. (2020). Kemendikbudristek. Retrieved from Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan: https://dikti.kemdikbud.go.id/pengumuman/panduan-penyusunan-kurikulum-pendidikan-tinggi-kpt-4-0
  2. Chernikova, O. H. (2020). Simulation-based learning in higher education: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 90(4), 499-541. Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com
  3. Dien Nur Chotimah, M. K. (2025). Outcome-Based Education (OBE) Curriculum: Implementation in the Arabic Language and Literature Study Program. Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan dan Ilmu Tarbiyah, 10(1), 369-382. Retrieved from https://ejournal.radenintan.ac.id
  4. Do Coyle, P. H. (2021). CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/350810489_Beyond_CLIL_Pluriliteracies_Teaching_for_Deeper_Learning
  5. Matthew B. Miles, A. M. (2018). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (Edition 3) (4 ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE Publications. Retrieved from https://collegepublishing.sagepub.com/products/qualitative-data-analysis
  6. Mertler, C. A. (2024). Action Research: Improving Schools and Empowering Educators (7 ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  7. Moleong, L. J. (2017). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (Edisi Revisi). Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
  8. Neni Hermita, S. S. (2025, Mei). ENHANCING CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS IN GRADUATES:AN EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING APPROACH. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 13(2), 1477-1496. Retrieved from https://journal.scadindependent.org
  9. Oktariza Mardatillah, J. P. (2024). THE IMPORTANCE OF CRITICAL THINKING SKILL TO VOCATIONAL STUDENTS: STRATEGIES AND BENEFITS. VOCATECH: Vocational Education and Technology Journal, 5(2), 22-33. Retrieved from http://ojs.aknacehbarat.ac.id
  10. Olga Chernikova, N. H. (2020). Simulation-based learning in higher education: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 90(4), 499–541. Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3102/0034654320933544

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.